Home › Evidence library › Anyone can prosecute
Key flaw 13 of 17 ·
Anyone can prosecute: no consent requirement
[n] evidence items · [n] accounts · [Jurisdictions]
What it does
The Bill does not require the consent of the Attorney General or the Director of Public Prosecutions before a prosecution is brought. Under s.6(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, any person can bring a private prosecution, including individuals or organisations with a campaigning interest. A private prosecutor does not need to be the victim, know the person involved, or have any connection to the case. A campaign group with no link to a family could, in principle, prosecute a parent.
Other routes into court are filtered. A judicial review claimant must show a “sufficient interest in the matter” (Senior Courts Act 1981 s.31(3)). Under the Bill’s own protection-order regime, anyone other than the individual, the police or a local authority needs the court’s leave, and the court must consider their connection to the individual (Sch. para 2(3)). The criminal offence has no equivalent filter.
The DPP can take over and discontinue a private prosecution (s.6(2)), but only at the DPP’s discretion and only after proceedings have begun. New Zealand’s Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Act 2022 requires the Attorney General’s consent before a prosecution is brought (s.12).
Effects: Families, practitioners and support organisations can be drawn into criminal proceedings by people with no connection to them. This leaves open a route to vexatious or politically motivated prosecutions. The cost and strain fall on the defendant before any review.
At a minimum
Require the personal consent of the Attorney General before a prosecution is brought, as New Zealand does. DPP consent is a weaker safeguard, because the DPP can delegate it to Crown Prosecutors.
Clause: no provision
-
There is no requirement for Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) or Attorney General consent.
What the Australian and New Zealand evidence shows
[Summary written after the evidence is in. State what the items below show, with counts where possible, and note any limits — for example, where evidence comes from one jurisdiction only.]
Evidence
[Evidence item 1 link] →
[Evidence item 1 label]
[Evidence item 1 placeholder]
[One or two sentences: what this document shows that bears on this flaw. Quote a short passage where possible, with a page or paragraph number.]
[Evidence item 2 link] →
[Evidence item 2 label]
[Evidence item 2 placeholder]
[One or two sentences: what this document shows that bears on this flaw. Quote a short passage where possible, with a page or paragraph number.]
[Evidence item 3 link] →
[Evidence item 3 label]
[Evidence item 3 placeholder]
[Evidence item 3 metadata]
[Evidence item 4 link] →
[Evidence item 4 label]
[Evidence item 4 placeholder]
[One or two sentences: what this document shows that bears on this flaw. Quote a short passage where possible, with a page or paragraph number.]
Related accounts
[Account 1 label]
[Account 1 summary]
[Account 2 label]
[Account 2 summary]
[Account 3 label]
[Account 3 summary]
Related flaws
← [Previous flaw: Key flaw 10
Evidence library
Do you hold evidence on this issue?
Submissions, decisions, correspondence or research from Australia or New Zealand.
