top of page

Home › Evidence library › Anyone can prosecute

Key flaw 13 of 17 · 

Anyone can prosecute: no consent requirement

[n] evidence items · [n] accounts · [Jurisdictions]

What it does

The Bill does not require the consent of the Attorney General or the Director of Public Prosecutions before a prosecution is brought. Under s.6(1) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, any person can bring a private prosecution, including individuals or organisations with a campaigning interest. A private prosecutor does not need to be the victim, know the person involved, or have any connection to the case. A campaign group with no link to a family could, in principle, prosecute a parent.
 

Other routes into court are filtered. A judicial review claimant must show a “sufficient interest in the matter” (Senior Courts Act 1981 s.31(3)). Under the Bill’s own protection-order regime, anyone other than the individual, the police or a local authority needs the court’s leave, and the court must consider their connection to the individual (Sch. para 2(3)). The criminal offence has no equivalent filter.

​

The DPP can take over and discontinue a private prosecution (s.6(2)), but only at the DPP’s discretion and only after proceedings have begun. New Zealand’s Conversion Practices Prohibition Legislation Act 2022 requires the Attorney General’s consent before a prosecution is brought (s.12).

​

Effects: Families, practitioners and support organisations can be drawn into criminal proceedings by people with no connection to them. This leaves open a route to vexatious or politically motivated prosecutions. The cost and strain fall on the defendant before any review.

At a minimum

Require the personal consent of the Attorney General before a prosecution is brought, as New Zealand does. DPP consent is a weaker safeguard, because the DPP can delegate it to Crown Prosecutors.

What the Australian and New Zealand evidence shows

[Summary written after the evidence is in. State what the items below show, with counts where possible, and note any limits — for example, where evidence comes from one jurisdiction only.]

Evidence

[Evidence item 1 link] →

[Evidence item 1 label]

[Evidence item 1 placeholder]

[One or two sentences: what this document shows that bears on this flaw. Quote a short passage where possible, with a page or paragraph number.]

[Evidence item 2 link] →

[Evidence item 2 label]

[Evidence item 2 placeholder]

[One or two sentences: what this document shows that bears on this flaw. Quote a short passage where possible, with a page or paragraph number.]

[Evidence item 3 link] →

[Evidence item 3 label]

[Evidence item 3 placeholder]

[Evidence item 3 metadata]

[Evidence item 4 link] →

[Evidence item 4 label]

[Evidence item 4 placeholder]

[One or two sentences: what this document shows that bears on this flaw. Quote a short passage where possible, with a page or paragraph number.]

Related accounts

[Account 1 label]

[Account 1 summary]

[Account 2 label]

[Account 2 summary]

[Account 3 label]

[Account 3 summary]

Related flaws

← [Previous flaw: Key flaw 10

Evidence library

Do you hold evidence on this issue?

Submissions, decisions, correspondence or research from Australia or New Zealand.

bottom of page