Home › Evidence library › Free for all prosecutions
Key flaw 14 of 17 ·
Liability of organisations and their officers (Cl. 5(2)
[n] evidence items · [n] accounts · [Jurisdictions]
What it does
If an organisation commits the offence, its directors, managers and members of its governing body commit it too if they authorised, permitted or participated in it, or if they “fail[ed] to take all reasonable steps to prevent” it (cl. 5(2)). The Bill does not define “manager”, and there is no code of practice or guidance on what “all reasonable steps” requires. The maximum penalty is five years’ imprisonment.
This is not the usual approach. Under the Bribery Act 2010, liability for failing to prevent an offence falls on the organisation, which has a defence if it had adequate procedures (s.7), and the Government must publish guidance on those procedures (s.9). Individual officers are liable only where the offence was committed with their consent or connivance (s.14). This Bill places failure-to-prevent liability on individual officers, with no defence and no guidance.
The provision reaches companies, charities, clinics, schools and academy trusts, universities, NHS bodies, local authorities, training bodies and parent support groups.
Effects: Officers face personal criminal liability for the conduct of staff and volunteers under an offence they cannot define. The safest response is defensive policy: restricting what staff may discuss, and adopting affirmation-led protocols to reduce the risk of complaint. Organisations are likely to rely on template policies from third-sector bodies, some of which have overstated the law in this area before. Organisations that support families or train practitioners are likely to restrict what is discussed. Staff who hold protected beliefs (Forstater) may face discipline under those policies.
At a minimum
Limit officer liability to conduct carried out with the officer’s consent or connivance, as in s.14 Bribery Act 2010, and remove “fails to take all reasonable steps to prevent”.
Clause
5 (1) This section applies if an offence under this Act is committed by a body within subsection (3).
5 (2) If a person who is, or is purporting to act as, a relevant officer of the body
authorises or permits, participates in, or fails to take all reasonable steps to prevent the commission of the offence, that person also commits the offence.
Paraphrasing cl 5 (3) the bodies within this subsection and “relevant officer”, in relation to such a body.
-
For a Company - relevant officer: A director, manager, secretary or similar officer.
-
For a Partnership - relevant officer: A partner
-
A body corporate (other than a company) or unincorporated body whose affairs are managed by a governing body - relevant officer: A member of the governing body.
-
A body corporate (other than a company) or unincorporated body whose affairs are managed by its members. - relevant officer: A member.
What the Australian and New Zealand evidence shows
[Summary written after the evidence is in. State what the items below show, with counts where possible, and note any limits — for example, where evidence comes from one jurisdiction only.]
Evidence
[Evidence item 1 link] →
[Evidence item 1 label]
[Evidence item 1 placeholder]
[One or two sentences: what this document shows that bears on this flaw. Quote a short passage where possible, with a page or paragraph number.]
[Evidence item 2 link] →
[Evidence item 2 label]
[Evidence item 2 placeholder]
[One or two sentences: what this document shows that bears on this flaw. Quote a short passage where possible, with a page or paragraph number.]
[Evidence item 3 link] →
[Evidence item 3 label]
[Evidence item 3 placeholder]
[Evidence item 3 metadata]
[Evidence item 4 link] →
[Evidence item 4 label]
[Evidence item 4 placeholder]
[One or two sentences: what this document shows that bears on this flaw. Quote a short passage where possible, with a page or paragraph number.]
Related accounts
[Account 1 label]
[Account 1 summary]
[Account 2 label]
[Account 2 summary]
[Account 3 label]
[Account 3 summary]
Related flaws
← [Previous flaw: Key flaw 10
Evidence library
Do you hold evidence on this issue?
Submissions, decisions, correspondence or research from Australia or New Zealand.
